![]() She's a Canadian Saudi expert at Waterloo University, and she says the crown prince's policy reflects this new Saudi nationalism.īESSMA MOMANI: He's very much interested in advancing Saudi Arabia first and foremost, and those longtime agreements of the great relationship with the United States just don't resonate anymore. And analysts say the Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman doesn't want to be limited to just working with the U.S., which has criticized him for human rights abuses in ways that China does not. commitment to security is not as strong as some before. still has huge military bases in the region, Arab Gulf countries have worried for years that the U.S. The U.S doesn't have direct relations with Iran, so China could talk to both. For Saudi Arabia, China is a big oil customer. In Iran, China is a big trading partner - about 30% of Iran's trade. Why Saudi-Iran? You know, for one thing, China has influence with both countries. often plays? And it seems like that might be just as important as the deal.ĪMOS: So, look, this is a new role for China, and it's hard to overstate that. How did China end up playing a role that the U.S. So now let's turn to the mediator in this deal. So this is a very bitter stalemate right now. And Iranian-backed Houthis - they've launched attacks into Saudi Arabia. There's a fragile cease-fire in Yemen, but Saudi airstrikes there have killed thousands. If the Chinese could do that, then, you know, Nobel Prizes all around.ĪMOS: So that's hard. Cease-fire in Yemen, but no settlement, right? To me, the real signal of a Saudi-Iranian rapprochement will be a settlement. I think that the essentials of the rivalry are still there. GREGORY GAUSE: There's still plenty of problems with Iran. Gause says Yemen will be the big test of a rivalry that's been the major fault line in the Middle East. We note he's also affiliated with a Washington think tank that's received funding from Saudi sources and many others. He's a prominent Saudi expert at Texas A&M. These two rivals have been on opposite sides of a number of regional conflicts - in Syria, in Iraq, in Yemen, and power struggles for control of Lebanon, too. ![]() RASCOE: So if these commitments are kept, what would that mean for the region?ĪMOS: Well, it might, and I must emphasize, might, calm tensions. And as important, they agreed to renew a security pact signed 22 years ago to cooperate on terrorism, drug smuggling, money laundering, and another agreement on trade and technology. Now, both sides are going to reopen embassies in two months. Things got worse again in 2019 after missile and drone attacks on Saudi oil facilities. ![]() The cleric was a Shia Muslim, as are most Iranians. What they were protesting is the beheading of a prominent Saudi cleric convicted on terrorism charges. Then Iranian protesters stormed the Saudi embassy in Iran. It's a return to diplomatic relations broken off since 2016. RASCOE: What can you tell us about this agreement?ĪMOS: So it was pretty simple as it was set out. Welcome to the program.ĭEBORAH AMOS, BYLINE: Thank you for having me. Saudi Arabia and Iran agreed to restore diplomatic ties that were cut several years ago, and the mediator was China. The phrase has also been used to describe the 1856 caning of Charles Sumner, an abolitionist Senator, by one of his pro-slavery opponents, Preston Brooks, on the floor of the United States Senate.Saudi Arabia and Iran have had tense relations for years, but on Friday, the two countries took a step towards toning down their animosity. So, you should join our demonstration against the expansion of the park. If you don’t join our demonstration against the expansion of the park, we will evict you from your apartment. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy gives this example of argumentum ad baculum: It is a special case of the appeal to consequences. One participates in argumentum ad baculum when one emphasizes the negative consequences of holding the contrary position, regardless of the contrary position's truth value - particularly when the argument-maker himself causes (or threatens to cause) those negative consequences. Please help improve this article by introducing citations to additional sources.įind sources: "Argumentum ad baculum" – news Īrgumentum ad baculum ( Latin for "argument to the cudgel" or " appeal to the stick") is the fallacy committed when one makes an appeal to force to bring about the acceptance of a conclusion. ![]() Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. This article relies largely or entirely on a single source.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |